This shift from product to service is one more change in a long history (there are stone tablets featuring lists of words that are well over 4000 years old). In that way, individuals previously reluctant to take up a relatively high annual subscription, would get the value of, say, a desktop publishing ecosystem or an e-reader, in addition to a renowned reference book.ĭictionaries have always evolved. In the future, I expect dictionary publishers to continue working in partnership with the world’s big digital companies, bundling access to their premium volumes with apps or hardware subscriptions.
The premium version - access to the OED and Macquarie Dictionary - once only available as massive physical tomes, is available with a recurring fee, but offers the convenience of online access and the benefit of constant updates.īut I think what exists at the moment is only a starting point much more is possible.
GET DICTIONARY APP TO DEFINE IN LAUNCHBAR FREE
The free version (Oxford’s Google definition and Pan Macmillan’s Macmillan dictionary definition) is limited but adequate for most. What we’re seeing here is a kind of freemium model. Its Macmillan Dictionary definition is freely available it invariably shows on the first page of search results. In the same way that Oxford (or more precisely Oxford University Press) is represented in search results (via the official Google definition), so is the publisher of the Macquarie Dictionary, Pan Macmillan. I use the word “publishers” advisedly here. By placing a high anchor price for individual plans (albeit with very few takers), publishers are able to better monetise their core segments. When you look at it from a business-to-business, rather than a business-to-consumer angle, it all makes sense. Individuals aren’t the target market institutions such as libraries and schools are. In fact, I suspect most people would have neither the need nor the willingness to pay for access to the premium versions. Access to the Macquarie Dictionary is $39.99 a year if you only want definitions and $49.99 a year if you want the thesaurus as well.Īs someone more than happy with the definitions and synonyms I get straight to my browser, neither subscription appeals to me. If you want access to the OED it’s £100 per year ($190). It comes from Oxford, which has been licensing to Google for more than a decade (it’s free to us, but Oxford aren’t left uncompensated).
If you ask Google about the word “digital”, for example, the top result will almost always be Google’s own definition. And now, as long as you have an internet connection and a search engine, free definitions and synonyms are half a second away. Perhaps the better question is how do publishers of the world’s great dictionaries continue to benefit from that value?ĭictionaries and thesauruses remain essential resources. But what about the vast accumulation of intellectual property dictionary publishers own - does it remain valuable today? That makes sense in a world where people so often choose a good digital alternative to an analogue product, system or service. It got me thinking that I haven’t used a physical dictionary in years. I was writing about an event I recently attended and found myself using a search that’s now second nature to me: I typed “ meaning” into Google. I came across that problem just recently. If you’re like me and you find yourself putting your thoughts onto the page (or the digital document) with any kind of frequency, you’ll know the words don’t always flow smoothly. Some dictionary users still want the physical product.
0 kommentar(er)
